I don't know. Does that make sense? Calling posts by the number of the order I read 'em in? For now, it's the best thing I can think of, so I'll keep it this way.
Started reading on the tube this morning on the way to work. Usually I write on the way in, but today I lost interest after Westminster, so decided today was as good a day as any to start off with the universe.
Book 1: Brian Green The Fabric of the Cosmos
The Penguin page is here, the Wikipedia entry on Brian Greene here, and Wikipedia entry on the book here*. Brian Greene on TED here.
I knew this was going to be good when a while back I'd picked up this book and opened it to the introduction and read
'Space and time capture the imagination like no other scientific subject. For good reason. They form the arena of reality, the very fabric of the cosmos. Our entire existence - everything we do, think and experience - takes place in some region of space during some interval of time. Yet science is still struggling to understand what space and time actually are. Are they real physical entities or simply useful ideas? If they're real, are they fundamental, or do they emerge from more basic constituents? What does it mean for space to be emtpy? Does time have a beginning? Does it have an arrow, flowing inexorably from past to future, as common experience would indicate? Can we manipulate space and time?'
followed by the first line of the first chapter
'None of the books in my father's dusty old bookcase were forbidden.'
I knew right then and there this will be a good book.
* note: I know, I know. Wikipedia. Some love it, some hate it. What I love about it is that they have articles on stuff that you can't really find anywhere else, and links to great sources sometimes. Something that a lot of people seem to overlook. For the sheer vast amounts of information (not always very good, but sometimes surprisingly so) I love it.